Itellectual Property Rights

Jason Cordero October 10, 2001 Intellectual Property Rights         A minimalist position is that desire to protect intellectual property honests is flushless and non possible. hence we should just let it be, and let the Internet stand as everything can be shared, copied, and/or distributed. They believe it would be to laborious to do anything around that why should we waste our time and trend trying to welter the problem.         In the case of Napster a minimalist would just channel it alone. They would figure that if you got ride of Napster then deuce more than(prenominal) symphony emcees would stamp out up. If they got ride of them then quaternity more would pop up, and so on. So why should they tease turnting ride of Napster. To them totally it means is that the creative persons would be in possession of to descend more silver elsewhere and if they didnt standardised it then so what.         A maximalist po sition would give publishers rights over any file, copy, or just about anything dealing with that producer. Basically you would be charged for anything and everything that you transfer or just come in liaison to. It would also make Internet service providers responsible for right of first publication infringements.         A maximalist would agree with what they did to Napster at the introduce time. To get songs from Napster you sustain to fabricate money so the horde can pay royalties to the artists. If the server did not comply with on that point decision and did not charge money then the server would just be shut down. It would mean that you couldnt download anything from these severs unless you compensable for it.         I deal we should go with the minimalists locate of view, witch would acquiesce with the utilitarian point of view, just let it be. Even though we have umteen rules now most people have found slipway around the rules. Many of the people dont dismantle off kno! w that there breaking the rules, because there is so much freedom on the Internet. Bothering to change all of the rules will impinge on years and lots of money. The problem will probably be quiet not be fixed.         Especially with the free music servers since they unfastened cd sales have gone up. So even without charging for downloaded music the artist made more money. People would download a song, like it, and go out and but the cd. So the minimalist point of view makes a lot more sense. It also still time, effort, and most of all our tax money will be spent on areas that need more attention then charging for downloads.          If you want to get a teeming essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay